Transparency alternatives to Doppel
Other Patent and trademark management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Doppel. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 28 that differ from Doppel on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Doppel has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Doppel” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Doppel | Found at Doppel, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PatSnappatsnap.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PatSnap | 52/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Wellspringwellspring.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Wellspring | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Amplifiedamplified.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Amplified | 43/100 | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Corsearchcorsearch.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Corsearch | 26/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Red Pointsredpoints.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Red Points | 13/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| IPRallyiprally.comSee also Transparency alternatives to IPRally | 48/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| PatentBotspatentbots.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PatentBots | 48/100 | 1 Subprocessor list | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| TechInsightstechinsights.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TechInsights | 32/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 2 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| EBRANDebrand.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EBRAND | 26/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Questelquestel.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Questel | 22/100 | 1 Subprocessor list | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Relecurarelecura.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Relecura | 22/100 | 1 Public pricing | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| IPzenipzen.comSee also Transparency alternatives to IPzen | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.