SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Inteum

Other Patent and trademark management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Inteum. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 28 that differ from Inteum on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Inteum has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Inteum” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at InteumFound at Inteum, not found there
PatSnappatsnap.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PatSnap 52/100 5 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 nothing Compare
IPRallyiprally.comSee also Transparency alternatives to IPRally 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 1 Certifications named Compare
Wellspringwellspring.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Wellspring 48/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 Certifications named Compare
Amplifiedamplified.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Amplified 43/100 4 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 1 Certifications named Compare
Doppeldoppel.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Doppel 50/100 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
PatentBotspatentbots.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PatentBots 48/100 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
TechInsightstechinsights.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TechInsights 32/100 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 1 Data location stated Compare
Corsearchcorsearch.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Corsearch 26/100 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
EBRANDebrand.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EBRAND 26/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare
Questelquestel.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Questel 22/100 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
IPzenipzen.comSee also Transparency alternatives to IPzen 17/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
MyMediaboxmymediabox.comSee also Transparency alternatives to MyMediabox 17/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Certifications named Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.