SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to EBRAND

Other Patent and trademark management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that EBRAND does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 22 that differ from EBRAND on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

EBRAND has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and EBRAND does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and EBRAND does notEBRAND publishes, and they do not
PatSnappatsnap.com 52/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
IPRallyiprally.com 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Amplifiedamplified.ai 43/100 3 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Wellspringwellspring.com 48/100 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history nothing Compare
Questelquestel.com 22/100 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Nameshieldnameshield.com 17/100 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Doppeldoppel.com 27/100 1 Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Corsearchcorsearch.com 26/100 1 Subprocessor list 1 Data location stated Compare
Inteuminteum.com 17/100 1 Certifications named 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
IPzenipzen.com 17/100 1 Public pricing 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Anaquaanaqua.com 13/100 1 Certifications named 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Red Pointsredpoints.com 13/100 1 Public pricing 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.