Transparency alternatives to Productiv
Other IT documentation and asset tracking vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Productiv does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 38 that differ from Productiv on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Productiv has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Productiv does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Productiv does not | Productiv publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Setylsetyl.com | 57/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +3 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Electricelectric.ai | 48/100 | 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Zlurizluri.com | 48/100 | 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Ardoqardoq.com | 48/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Paligopaligo.net | 48/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Cledaracledara.com | 39/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Orbusorbussoftware.com | 39/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Planviewplanview.com | 39/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Reftabreftab.com | 39/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Toriitoriihq.com | 39/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Zylozylo.com | 39/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Bizzdesignbizzdesign.com | 38/100 | 5 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.