SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Teachable

Other Learning management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Teachable. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 42 that differ from Teachable on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Teachable has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Teachable” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at TeachableFound at Teachable, not found there
Anthologyanthology.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Anthology 48/100 3 Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 Compare
TalentLMStalentlms.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TalentLMS 52/100 2 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history Compare
Articulatearticulate.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Articulate 39/100 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) 4 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 Compare
Skilljarskilljar.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Skilljar 70/100 1 Data location stated nothing Compare
Codiocodio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Codio 57/100 1 Uptime SLA with a figure 1 Named privacy contact Compare
LearnWorldslearnworlds.comSee also Transparency alternatives to LearnWorlds 57/100 1 Data location stated 2 Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
D2Ld2l.comSee also Transparency alternatives to D2L 43/100 1 Data location stated 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Arloarlo.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Arlo 39/100 1 Data location stated 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Cypher Learningcypherlearning.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cypher Learning 39/100 1 Data location stated 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 Compare
Continucontinu.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Continu 30/100 1 Uptime SLA with a figure 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Instructureinstructure.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Instructure 30/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Podiapodia.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Podia 30/100 1 Data location stated 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.