SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Instructure

Other Learning management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Instructure does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 25 that differ from Instructure on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Instructure has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Instructure does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Instructure does notInstructure publishes, and they do not
TalentLMStalentlms.com 60/100 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Skilljarskilljar.com 65/100 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Teachableteachable.com 65/100 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Anthologyanthology.com 60/100 2 Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Edmingleedmingle.com 48/100 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Coassemblecoassemble.com 45/100 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Continucontinu.com 45/100 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
LearnWorldslearnworlds.com 45/100 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Cypher Learningcypherlearning.com 50/100 1 Public pricing 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
D2Ld2l.com 43/100 1 Data processing agreement 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
eloomieloomi.com 40/100 1 Data processing agreement 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Tovutitovutilms.com 40/100 1 Public pricing 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.