Transparency alternatives to Skilljar
Other Learning management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Skilljar. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 42 that differ from Skilljar on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Skilljar has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Skilljar” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Skilljar | Found at Skilljar, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthologyanthology.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Anthology | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| TalentLMStalentlms.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TalentLMS | 52/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history | Compare |
| Codiocodio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Codio | 57/100 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Articulatearticulate.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Articulate | 39/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Continucontinu.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Continu | 30/100 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | Compare |
| Instructureinstructure.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Instructure | 30/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| GoSkillsgoskills.comSee also Transparency alternatives to GoSkills | 4/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 8 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +5 | Compare |
| LearnWorldslearnworlds.comSee also Transparency alternatives to LearnWorlds | 57/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| Teachableteachable.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Teachable | 57/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| D2Ld2l.comSee also Transparency alternatives to D2L | 43/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Arloarlo.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Arlo | 39/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Cypher Learningcypherlearning.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cypher Learning | 39/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.