Transparency alternatives to LawWare
Other Legal practice management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that LawWare does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 49 that differ from LawWare on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
LawWare has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and LawWare does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and LawWare does not | LawWare publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amberloamberlo.io | 43/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Cerenadecerenade.com | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Assembly Neosassemblysoftware.com | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Litifylitify.com | 35/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Matters.Cloudmatters.cloud | 35/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Smokeballsmokeball.com | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Eliteelite.com | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Filevinefilevine.com | 30/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| MyCasemycase.com | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Legitolegito.com | 29/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| CARET Legalcaretlegal.com | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Aderantaderant.com | 17/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.