SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Insignia

Other Library systems vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Insignia does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 20 that differ from Insignia on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Insignia has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Insignia does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Insignia does notInsignia publishes, and they do not
Clarivateclarivate.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
OverDriveoverdrive.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 nothing Compare
EBSCOebsco.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Bibliothecabibliotheca.com 17/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Liberoliberolms.com 17/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Alexandriagoalexandria.com 13/100 1 Data location stated 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Atriuumbooksys.com 13/100 1 Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Ex Librisexlibrisgroup.com 13/100 1 Certifications named nothing Compare
Allegroallegro-c.de 9/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Hooplahoopladigital.com 9/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Primasoftprimasoft.com 9/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Lyngsoelyngsoesystems.com 4/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.