Transparency alternatives to Backendless
Other Low-code and internal tools vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Backendless. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 46 that differ from Backendless on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Backendless has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Backendless” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Backendless | Found at Backendless, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forest Adminforestadmin.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Forest Admin | 70/100 | 7 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +4 | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Retoolretool.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Retool | 61/100 | 7 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +4 | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Mendixmendix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mendix | 52/100 | 6 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +3 | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Pegapega.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pega | 52/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +3 | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Superblockssuperblocks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Superblocks | 52/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Caspiocaspio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Caspio | 57/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Teableteable.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Teable | 57/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Budibasebudibase.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Budibase | 48/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Agilebaseagilebase.co.ukSee also Transparency alternatives to Agilebase | 39/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Betty Blocksbettyblocks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Betty Blocks | 39/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| RUAL Corerual.nlSee also Transparency alternatives to RUAL Core | 35/100 | 5 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, +2 | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Xanoxano.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Xano | 35/100 | 5 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.