Transparency alternatives to Alterian Journey Insight
Other Marketing attribution vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Alterian Journey Insight. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 42 that differ from Alterian Journey Insight on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Alterian Journey Insight has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Alterian Journey Insight” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Alterian Journey Insight | Found at Alterian Journey Insight, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supermetricssupermetrics.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Supermetrics | 65/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Factors.aifactors.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Factors.ai | 61/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Analyzifyanalyzify.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Analyzify | 57/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Dubdub.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Dub | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | nothing | Compare |
| AppsFlyerappsflyer.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AppsFlyer | 50/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | nothing | Compare |
| Clarisightsclarisights.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Clarisights | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| HockeyStackhockeystack.comSee also Transparency alternatives to HockeyStack | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Northbeamnorthbeam.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Northbeam | 43/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Short.ioshort.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Short.io | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Tealiumtealium.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tealium | 39/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Treasure Datatreasuredata.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Treasure Data | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| DashThisdashthis.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DashThis | 43/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.