Transparency alternatives to Eye Cloud Pro
Other Medical practice software vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Eye Cloud Pro. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 88 that differ from Eye Cloud Pro on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Eye Cloud Pro has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Eye Cloud Pro” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Eye Cloud Pro | Found at Eye Cloud Pro, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nookalnookal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nookal | 78/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Semblesemble.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Semble | 39/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Heidi Healthheidihealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Heidi Health | 52/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Quincyfrey.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Quincy | 22/100 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Clinikocliniko.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cliniko | 43/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Clinicmasterclinicmaster.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Clinicmaster | 39/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Doctenadoctena.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Doctena | 35/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Teleclinicteleclinic.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Teleclinic | 35/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| NextGennextgen.comSee also Transparency alternatives to NextGen | 30/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| SimplePracticesimplepractice.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SimplePractice | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| 4D EMR4d-emr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to 4D EMR | 22/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Doctolibdoctolib.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Doctolib | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.