SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Quincy

Other Medical practice software vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Quincy does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 32 that differ from Quincy on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Quincy has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Quincy does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Quincy does notQuincy publishes, and they do not
Nookalnookal.com 78/100 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Clinikocliniko.com 43/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact Compare
Heidi Healthheidihealth.com 43/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact Compare
Semblesemble.io 39/100 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Doctenadoctena.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Tebratebra.com 30/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact Compare
NextGennextgen.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
SimplePracticesimplepractice.com 26/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact Compare
Doctolibdoctolib.de 22/100 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact Compare
samedisamedi.de 22/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact Compare
CGMcgm.com 17/100 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact Compare
DrChronodrchrono.com 17/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.