Transparency alternatives to Teleclinic
Other Medical practice software vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Teleclinic does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 87 that differ from Teleclinic on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Teleclinic has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Teleclinic does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Teleclinic does not | Teleclinic publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nookalnookal.com | 78/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Semblesemble.io | 39/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Clinikocliniko.com | 43/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Doctenadoctena.com | 35/100 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Clinicmasterclinicmaster.com | 30/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named | 4 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| Heidi Healthheidihealth.com | 30/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Doctolibdoctolib.de | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| samedisamedi.de | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| CGMcgm.com | 17/100 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| Mira Healthmirahealth.care | 13/100 | 2 Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| NextGennextgen.com | 30/100 | 1 Certifications named | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| SimplePracticesimplepractice.com | 26/100 | 1 Status page with history | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.