SaaS Ranking
Menu

Nscale: what they publish

nscale.com · MLOps and model serving · checked 2026-10-17

52/100DBand D

Rank 3 of 34 in MLOps and model serving, where the median is 24.

Public transparency score, not a product or security rating. Latest check: 2026-10-17. How the score works.

Evidence at a glance

Choose a check to see its source, date and scope.

Not found means not found at the addresses we checked. Not measured means we could not complete the check.

Start a vendor reviewDownload evidence (CSV)

Overview

2 days since the newest dated result, 2 since the oldest. 12 of 12 criteria have a measured result in the last 30 days. Failed checks and undated results are excluded.

Evidence freshness is a statement about our measurement and is kept apart from the transparency score, which is frozen at v1. How good our own measurement is.

Transparency labelsaas-ranking.com

Nscale

nscale.com · MLOps and model serving

  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
D 52of 100 Rank 3 of 34

Published commitments4 of 9 found

Measured behaviour2 of 3 found

Checked 2026-10-17. Every line links the page we found it on. A cross means we found nothing at the addresses we checked, not that the vendor has no such document. A transparency score, not a product rating.

Downloads include all checks, source URLs, dates and the snapshot ID for your procurement file. We do not issue badges.

The label is the whole measurement in one object: every criterion with its weight, the band, and the date. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Every line in it links the page we found the result on, or lists the addresses we checked. A cross means we found nothing there, not that Nscale has no such document.

Where Nscale sits in MLOps and model serving

  1. A0 0%
  2. B0 0%
  3. C1 3%
  4. D5 15%
  5. E11 32%
  6. F17 50%
34 vendors with a score; 3 more without a score because we could measure too little. Bands have fixed thresholds, see how the score works.

The band of Nscale is marked. Vendors without a score are the ones where we could measure too few criteria to rank them – a gap on our side, counted separately.

What Nscale states

The exact figures and names we read off the pages linked below, with the sentence they stand in. This is what they publish, not what we verified about their systems.

Gaps, heaviest first

✗

Data processing agreement (DPA)

weight 3 of 3

No data processing agreement found.

Checked 8 addresses on 2026-10-17.

Show the 8 addresses we checked
  1. https://nscale.com/legal/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://nscale.com/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://nscale.com/legal/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://nscale.com/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://nscale.com/legal/data-processing-addendum – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://nscale.com/legal/gdpr – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://nscale.com/trust/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  8. https://nscale.com/privacy/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Data processing agreement in MLOps and model serving: 6 of 34 companies

✗

Public pricing with figures

weight 2 of 3

No public pricing with figures found.

Checked 5 addresses on 2026-10-17.

Show the 5 addresses we checked
  1. https://nscale.com/pricing – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://nscale.com/pricing/ – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://nscale.com/plans – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://nscale.com/en/pricing – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://nscale.com/pricing-plans – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Public pricing in MLOps and model serving: 18 of 35 companies

✗weight 2 of 3

Third-party requests seen on the first load, before any interaction.

Checked 1 address on 2026-10-17.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://nscale.com/ – third-party requests before any interaction: cdn-ukwest.onetrust.com, cdn.jsdelivr.net, cdn.prod.website-files.com, d3e54v103j8qbb.cloudfront.net, eu-assets.i.posthog.com, eu.i.posthog.com, forms-eu1.hsforms.com, geolocation.onetrust.com, js-eu1.hsforms.net, nscale-v5.pages.dev, nscale.b-cdn.net, pagead2.googlesyndication.com, unpkg.com, www.googletagmanager.com

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: No third-party tracking before consent in MLOps and model serving: 1 of 36 companies

✗

Notice before subprocessors change

weight 2 of 3

No commitment to give notice before subprocessors change found.

Checked 8 addresses on 2026-10-17.

Show the 8 addresses we checked
  1. https://nscale.com/legal/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  2. https://nscale.com/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://nscale.com/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://nscale.com/legal/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://nscale.com/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://nscale.com/legal/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://nscale.com/trust/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  8. https://nscale.com/legal/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Notice before subprocessors change in MLOps and model serving: 5 of 34 companies

✗

Uptime SLA with a figure

weight 1 of 3

No uptime figure found.

Checked 6 addresses on 2026-10-17.

Show the 6 addresses we checked
  1. https://nscale.com/legal/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://nscale.com/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://nscale.com/legal/service-level-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://nscale.com/trust/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://nscale.com/uptime – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://nscale.com/legal/uptime-sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Uptime SLA with a figure in MLOps and model serving: 1 of 34 companies

✗

Named privacy contact (DPO or privacy address)

weight 1 of 3

No named privacy contact found.

Checked 7 addresses on 2026-10-17.

Show the 7 addresses we checked
  1. https://nscale.com/legal/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://nscale.com/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://nscale.com/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://nscale.com/legal/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://nscale.com/legal/privacy-notice – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://nscale.com/trust/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://nscale.com/datenschutz – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Named privacy contact in MLOps and model serving: 15 of 35 companies

Evidence

The full source lists sit behind these two groups, so that the answer above stays readable.

Published, with a source 6
✓

Subprocessors: the published list

weight 3 of 3

The actual list is published, not just a promise to keep one.

Source: https://www.nscale.com/policies/sub-processors · checked 2026-10-17

Across the market: Subprocessor list in MLOps and model serving: 2 of 34 companies

✓

Data location: where they say data is hosted

weight 3 of 3

The hosting location is stated on a public page.

  • Locations named next to the hosting wording United Kingdom, United States, Virginia. This does not establish the company’s headquarters.
    Show the 3 exact wordings

    ecurity at Nscale | Nscale Data Centers Nscale data centers Glomfjord Norway Narvik Norway Loughton United Kingdom Texas United States Partner-run data centers Sines Portugal Keflavik Iceland Stavange...

    Read at https://www.nscale.com/security

    scale Data Centers Nscale data centers Glomfjord Norway Narvik Norway Loughton United Kingdom Texas United States Partner-run data centers Sines Portugal Keflavik Iceland Stavanger Norway Oslo Norway....

    Read at https://www.nscale.com/security

    ger Norway Oslo Norway Blönduós Iceland Hayes United Kingdom North Carolina United States AVAILABLE DATA CENTERS West Virginia United States Texas, USA All Data Centers Services Explore our full AI st...

    Read at https://www.nscale.com/security

Source: https://www.nscale.com/security · checked 2026-10-17

Across the market: Data location stated in MLOps and model serving: 9 of 35 companies

✓

Status page with incident history

weight 2 of 3

A public status page with incident history.

Source: https://status.nscale.com/ · checked 2026-10-17

Across the market: Status page with history in MLOps and model serving: 12 of 36 companies

✓

HTTPS enforced with HSTS

weight 2 of 3

HTTP redirects to HTTPS and the HSTS header is set.

  • HSTS max-age 31536000 seconds (365 days).
    Show the exact wording

    max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Read at https://nscale.com/
  • HSTS options includeSubDomains, preload.
    Show the 2 exact wordings

    max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Read at https://nscale.com/

    max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Read at https://nscale.com/

Source: https://nscale.com/ · checked 2026-10-17

Across the market: HTTPS enforced with HSTS in MLOps and model serving: 28 of 36 companies

✓

Certifications named (SOC 2, ISO 27001)

weight 1 of 3

SOC 2 or ISO 27001 named on a public page.

  • Named on that page ISO/IEC 27001 (unclear from the sentence), SOC 2 Type II (not counted: the sentence does not carry it). The sentence we kept does not carry this finding on its own, so it counts in no list and no figure.
    Show the 2 exact wordings

    Independent assurance ISO/IEC 27001 certification and SOC 2 Type 2 reporting give you third-party evidence for your own compliance revi

    Read at https://www.nscale.com/security

    Independent assurance ISO/IEC 27001 certification and SOC 2 Type 2 reporting give you third-party evidence for your own compliance reviews.

    Read at https://www.nscale.com/security

Source: https://www.nscale.com/security · checked 2026-10-17

Across the market: Certifications named in MLOps and model serving: 13 of 35 companies

✓

security.txt (RFC 9116)

weight 1 of 3

Served at /.well-known/security.txt.

Source: https://nscale.com/.well-known/security.txt · checked 2026-10-17

Across the market: security.txt (RFC 9116) in MLOps and model serving: 10 of 34 companies

History

100 0 2026-10-10: 30 of 1002026-10-17: 52 of 100 2026-10-10 2026-10-17
Score over the last 2 runs we measured Nscale in: 30 (2026-10-10), 52 (2026-10-17).

Prepare your vendor review

A source is a starting point. Check the product, plan, legal entity and date before treating it as evidence for your purchase. These questions do not change the transparency score.

Nscale

6 found · 6 not found · 0 not measured across 12 public checks.

12 of 12 criteria have a measured result from the last 30 days. Oldest dated result: 2026-10-17.

Investigate 6 open evidence questions
  1. Data processing agreement

    Please share the current data processing agreement for the product and plan we are considering, including its annexes and signing process.

    Inspect this check
  2. Public pricing

    Please confirm the total cost for our seats and usage, including minimum commitments, add-ons, overages and renewal terms.

    Inspect this check
  3. Uptime SLA with a figure

    Which availability commitment applies to our plan? Please include the measurement window, exclusions and credit claim process.

    Inspect this check
  4. No third-party tracking before consent

    Which third-party requests occur before a visitor makes a choice, and for what purpose? Please distinguish the public website from the product.

    Inspect this check
  5. Notice before subprocessors change

    How will you notify us before a subprocessor changes, with how much notice, and what response options apply to our contract?

    Inspect this check
  6. Named privacy contact

    Which privacy contact handles requests for our account, and what escalation path should we use?

    Inspect this check

Compare

A shortlist holds up to six vendors across categories and lives entirely in the address of its page: share the link, bookmark it, put it in a ticket. Nothing is stored, so we do not know it exists.