Transparency alternatives to Superwise
Other MLOps and model serving vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Superwise. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 34 that differ from Superwise on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Superwise has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “Found there, not found at Superwise” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Superwise | Found at Superwise, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basetenbaseten.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Baseten | 52/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| H2O.aih2o.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to H2O.ai | 57/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing | Compare |
| Nscalenscale.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nscale | 52/100 | 1 Status page with history | 3 Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| RunPodrunpod.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to RunPod | 52/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated | Compare |
| Vast.aivast.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Vast.ai | 52/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 3 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Paperspacepaperspace.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Paperspace | 43/100 | 1 Status page with history | 4 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Modalmodal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Modal | 39/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Unionunion.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Union | 39/100 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | 4 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| CoreWeavecoreweave.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CoreWeave | 35/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 | Compare |
| BentoMLbentoml.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BentoML | 32/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Cometcomet.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Comet | 30/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 | Compare |
| DataRobotdatarobot.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DataRobot | 30/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.