Transparency alternatives to Nscale
Other MLOps and model serving vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Nscale. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 33 that differ from Nscale on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Nscale has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Nscale” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Nscale | Found at Nscale, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basetenbaseten.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Baseten | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| RunPodrunpod.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to RunPod | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history | Compare |
| Superwisesuperwise.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Superwise | 65/100 | 3 Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Vast.aivast.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Vast.ai | 52/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| H2O.aih2o.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to H2O.ai | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history | Compare |
| Modalmodal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Modal | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | Compare |
| Unionunion.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Union | 39/100 | 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| DataRobotdatarobot.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DataRobot | 30/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Replicatereplicate.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Replicate | 30/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Anyscaleanyscale.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Anyscale | 26/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | Compare |
| Fireworks AIfireworks.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Fireworks AI | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | Compare |
| Together AItogether.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Together AI | 17/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.