SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Domotz

Other Network monitoring vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Domotz does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 21 that differ from Domotz on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Domotz has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Domotz does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Domotz does notDomotz publishes, and they do not
Kentikkentik.com 65/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Auvikauvik.com 52/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
LogicMonitorlogicmonitor.com 52/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Paesslerpaessler.com 43/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 1 Status page with history Compare
Cambiumcambiumnetworks.com 26/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Catchpointcatchpoint.com 26/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Netgear Insightnetgear.com 39/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Icingaicinga.com 22/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Aristaarista.com 13/100 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Nagiosnagios.com 13/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Netskopenetskope.com 26/100 1 Data location stated 1 Status page with history Compare
Nile Networksnilesecure.com 22/100 1 Data location stated 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.