SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Donorbox

Other Nonprofit fundraising vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Donorbox. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 36 that differ from Donorbox on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Donorbox has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Donorbox” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at DonorboxFound at Donorbox, not found there
Handbidhandbid.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Handbid 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Beaconbeaconcrm.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Beacon 52/100 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 1 Data location stated Compare
Donorfydonorfy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Donorfy 48/100 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Keelakeela.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Keela 30/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Blackbaudblackbaud.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Blackbaud 26/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Mightycausemightycause.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mightycause 22/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 Compare
GRÜN Softwaregruen.netSee also Transparency alternatives to GRÜN Software 17/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 Compare
Funraisefunraise.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Funraise 39/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
VerticalChangeverticalchange.comSee also Transparency alternatives to VerticalChange 39/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Bloomerangbloomerang.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Bloomerang 30/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Givebuttergivebutter.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Givebutter 30/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
OneCauseonecause.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OneCause 30/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.