Transparency alternatives to Handbid
Other Nonprofit fundraising vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Handbid. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 36 that differ from Handbid on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Handbid has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Handbid” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Handbid | Found at Handbid, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beaconbeaconcrm.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Beacon | 52/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Donorboxdonorbox.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Donorbox | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Funraisefunraise.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Funraise | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| VerticalChangeverticalchange.comSee also Transparency alternatives to VerticalChange | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Keelakeela.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Keela | 30/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Neon Oneneonone.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Neon One | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Blackbaudblackbaud.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Blackbaud | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| GRÜN Softwaregruen.netSee also Transparency alternatives to GRÜN Software | 17/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Donorfydonorfy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Donorfy | 48/100 | 1 Data location stated | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Bloomerangbloomerang.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Bloomerang | 30/100 | 1 Status page with history | 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Givebuttergivebutter.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Givebutter | 30/100 | 1 Data location stated | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| OneCauseonecause.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OneCause | 30/100 | 1 Data location stated | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.