SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Keela

Other Nonprofit fundraising vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Keela does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 23 that differ from Keela on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Keela has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Keela does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Keela does notKeela publishes, and they do not
Handbidhandbid.com 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Donorboxdonorbox.org 30/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Virtuousvirtuous.org 48/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named nothing Compare
Bloomerangbloomerang.co 43/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Beaconbeaconcrm.org 39/100 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named 1 Status page with history Compare
Blackbaudblackbaud.com 39/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 1 Public pricing Compare
Funraisefunraise.org 39/100 1 Data location stated 1 Named privacy contact Compare
GoFundMe Proclassy.org 35/100 1 Data location stated 1 Status page with history Compare
DonorPerfectdonorperfect.com 32/100 1 Data location stated 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
GiveWPgivewp.com 32/100 1 Data location stated 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Givebuttergivebutter.com 30/100 1 Data location stated 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
OneCauseonecause.com 30/100 1 Data location stated 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.