SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Blackbaud

Other Nonprofit fundraising vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Blackbaud. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 36 that differ from Blackbaud on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Blackbaud has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Blackbaud” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at BlackbaudFound at Blackbaud, not found there
Handbidhandbid.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Handbid 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Beaconbeaconcrm.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Beacon 52/100 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Donorfydonorfy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Donorfy 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Donorboxdonorbox.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Donorbox 39/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Funraisefunraise.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Funraise 39/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
VerticalChangeverticalchange.comSee also Transparency alternatives to VerticalChange 39/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
Givebuttergivebutter.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Givebutter 30/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
Neon Oneneonone.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Neon One 30/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
OneCauseonecause.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OneCause 30/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
JustGivingjustgiving.comSee also Transparency alternatives to JustGiving 22/100 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
Bloomerangbloomerang.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Bloomerang 30/100 1 Public pricing 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Keelakeela.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Keela 30/100 1 Public pricing 1 Certifications named Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.