Transparency alternatives to Neon One
Other Nonprofit fundraising vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Neon One. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 37 that differ from Neon One on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Neon One has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Neon One” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Neon One | Found at Neon One, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beaconbeaconcrm.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Beacon | 52/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Handbidhandbid.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Handbid | 48/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | Compare |
| Donorfydonorfy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Donorfy | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Virtuousvirtuous.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Virtuous | 43/100 | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Blackbaudblackbaud.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Blackbaud | 26/100 | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| GRÜN Softwaregruen.netSee also Transparency alternatives to GRÜN Software | 17/100 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Donorboxdonorbox.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Donorbox | 39/100 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | nothing | Compare |
| Bloomerangbloomerang.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Bloomerang | 30/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Keelakeela.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Keela | 30/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| JustGivingjustgiving.comSee also Transparency alternatives to JustGiving | 22/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | Compare |
| Mightycausemightycause.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mightycause | 22/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | Compare |
| Springlyspringly.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Springly | 14/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.