Transparency alternatives to Pushover
Other Push and realtime messaging vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Pushover. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
9 shown of 9 that differ from Pushover on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Pushover has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Pushover” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Pushover | Found at Pushover, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PushEngagepushengage.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PushEngage | 52/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Pusherpusher.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pusher | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| TrueDialogtruedialog.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TrueDialog | 26/100 | 1 Certifications named | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Pushsaferpushsafer.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pushsafer | 17/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 4 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| Webpushrwebpushr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Webpushr | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | 4 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| Catapushcatapush.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Catapush | 13/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| PushAlertpushalert.coSee also Transparency alternatives to PushAlert | 17/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| WonderPushwonderpush.comSee also Transparency alternatives to WonderPush | 9/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| ntfyntfy.shSee also Transparency alternatives to ntfy | 0/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.