Transparency alternatives to Pusher
Other Push and realtime messaging vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Pusher. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
9 shown of 9 that differ from Pusher on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Pusher has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Pusher” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Pusher | Found at Pusher, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PushEngagepushengage.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PushEngage | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Pushoverpushover.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Pushover | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| TrueDialogtruedialog.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TrueDialog | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Pushsaferpushsafer.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pushsafer | 17/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| PushAlertpushalert.coSee also Transparency alternatives to PushAlert | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Webpushrwebpushr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Webpushr | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Catapushcatapush.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Catapush | 13/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| WonderPushwonderpush.comSee also Transparency alternatives to WonderPush | 9/100 | 1 Public pricing | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| ntfyntfy.shSee also Transparency alternatives to ntfy | 0/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.