Alternatives to Catapush
Other Push and realtime messaging vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Catapush does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
9 shown of 9 that differ from Catapush on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Catapush has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Catapush does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Catapush does not | Catapush publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PushEngagepushengage.com | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Pushoverpushover.net | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Pusherpusher.com | 26/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| TrueDialogtruedialog.com | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Webpushrwebpushr.com | 17/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| PushAlertpushalert.co | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Pushsaferpushsafer.com | 17/100 | 1 Data location stated | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| WonderPushwonderpush.com | 9/100 | 1 Public pricing | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| ntfyntfy.sh | 0/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.