SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Pushsafer

Other Push and realtime messaging vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Pushsafer does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

7 shown of 7 that differ from Pushsafer on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Pushsafer has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Pushsafer does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Pushsafer does notPushsafer publishes, and they do not
PushEngagepushengage.com 52/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Pusherpusher.com 26/100 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Pushoverpushover.net 39/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent 1 Named privacy contact Compare
PushAlertpushalert.co 17/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Webpushrwebpushr.com 17/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
WonderPushwonderpush.com 9/100 1 Public pricing 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
ntfyntfy.sh 0/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.