SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Airwallex

Other Payment processing vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Airwallex does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 26 that differ from Airwallex on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Airwallex has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Airwallex does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Airwallex does notAirwallex publishes, and they do not
Adyenadyen.com 65/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 1 Status page with history Compare
Maxiomaxio.com 70/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Molliemollie.com 61/100 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 nothing Compare
Recurlyrecurly.com 55/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
GoCardlessgocardless.com 55/100 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named nothing Compare
Lemon Squeezylemonsqueezy.com 50/100 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Squaresquareup.com 40/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Paddlepaddle.com 39/100 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
Razorpayrazorpay.com 27/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 2 Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
SumUpsumup.com 50/100 1 Data location stated nothing Compare
Stancerstancer.com 45/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent nothing Compare
Braintreebraintreepayments.com 35/100 1 Data location stated 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.