SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to GoCardless

Other Payment processing vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that GoCardless does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 25 that differ from GoCardless on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

GoCardless has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “publishes and GoCardless does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and GoCardless does notGoCardless publishes, and they do not
Maxiomaxio.com 70/100 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Recurlyrecurly.com 55/100 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Adyenadyen.com 65/100 1 Data location stated 1 Status page with history Compare
Lemon Squeezylemonsqueezy.com 50/100 1 Data location stated 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
SumUpsumup.com 50/100 1 Data location stated 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named Compare
Stancerstancer.com 45/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named Compare
Squaresquareup.com 40/100 1 Data location stated 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Braintreebraintreepayments.com 35/100 1 Data location stated 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Razorpayrazorpay.com 27/100 1 Data location stated 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 Compare
Novalnetnovalnet.de 26/100 1 Data location stated 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 Compare
Molliemollie.com 61/100 nothing we found there and not here nothing Compare
Paddlepaddle.com 39/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Status page with history, Certifications named Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.