SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Stancer

Other Payment processing vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Stancer does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 26 that differ from Stancer on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Stancer has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure. The column “publishes and Stancer does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Stancer does notStancer publishes, and they do not
Maxiomaxio.com 70/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 3 Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Adyenadyen.com 65/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named 2 Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Recurlyrecurly.com 55/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Molliemollie.com 61/100 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
GoCardlessgocardless.com 55/100 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Lemon Squeezylemonsqueezy.com 50/100 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated 3 Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Squaresquareup.com 40/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 3 Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
SumUpsumup.com 50/100 1 Data location stated 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Paddlepaddle.com 39/100 1 Data processing agreement 2 Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Braintreebraintreepayments.com 35/100 1 Data location stated 3 Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Stripestripe.com 30/100 1 Certifications named 2 Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Razorpayrazorpay.com 27/100 1 Data location stated 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.