Performance management vendors, ranked by transparency
Performance review and employee engagement tools, ranked by what they publish about how they handle your data.
- 29Vendors
- 29Ranked
- 12Criteria each
- 2026-08-31Checked
| # | Vendor | Score | DPA | Subproc. | Region | Status | Pricing | Certs | SLA | HSTS | Consent | sec.txt | Notice | Contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PerformYard | 72 | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | – | ✗ | – | – |
| 2 | Lattice | 65 | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 3 | Betterworks | 60 | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 4 | Profit.co | 60 | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 5 | Small Improvements | 60 | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 6 | Leapsome | 55 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 7 | WorkBoard | 55 | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 8 | Kudos | 50 | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 9 | Trakstar | 50 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 10 | Zensai | 50 | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 11 | Nectar | 45 | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 12 | Quantum Workplace | 45 | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 13 | 15Five | 40 | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 14 | Achievers | 40 | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 15 | Culture Amp | 40 | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 16 | Energage | 40 | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 17 | Mooncamp | 40 | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 18 | Motivosity | 40 | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 19 | Perdoo | 40 | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 20 | Assembly | 35 | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 21 | Bonusly | 35 | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 22 | Peakon | 35 | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 23 | WorkTango | 30 | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 24 | Engagedly | 25 | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 25 | Weekdone | 25 | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 26 | Workleap | 20 | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 27 | ClearCompany | 17 | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | – | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 28 | Primalogik | 15 | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
| 29 | Workhuman | 10 | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | – | – |
This category, criterion by criterion
How this market does on each criterion, with its own share and how it compares with the rest.
Data processing agreement · Subprocessor list · Data location stated · Status page with history · Public pricing · Certifications named · Uptime SLA with a figure · HTTPS enforced with HSTS · No third-party tracking before consent · security.txt (RFC 9116)
Every result links its source on the vendor page. A dash means we could not measure it, not that it is missing. See how we score.