SaaS Ranking
Menu

Profit.co: what they publish

profit.co · Performance management · checked 2026-10-12

57/100CBand C

Rank 6 of 41 in Performance management, where the median is 30.

Public transparency score, not a product or security rating. Latest check: 2026-10-12. How the score works.

Evidence at a glance

Choose a check to see its source, date and scope.

Not found means not found at the addresses we checked. Not measured means we could not complete the check.

Start a vendor reviewDownload evidence (CSV)

Overview

4 days since the newest dated result, 4 since the oldest. 12 of 12 criteria have a measured result in the last 30 days. Failed checks and undated results are excluded.

Evidence freshness is a statement about our measurement and is kept apart from the transparency score, which is frozen at v1. How good our own measurement is.

Transparency labelsaas-ranking.com

Profit.co

profit.co · Performance management

  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
C 57of 100 Rank 6 of 41

Published commitments6 of 9 found

Measured behaviour1 of 3 found

Checked 2026-10-12. Every line links the page we found it on. A cross means we found nothing at the addresses we checked, not that the vendor has no such document. A transparency score, not a product rating.

Downloads include all checks, source URLs, dates and the snapshot ID for your procurement file. We do not issue badges.

The label is the whole measurement in one object: every criterion with its weight, the band, and the date. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Every line in it links the page we found the result on, or lists the addresses we checked. A cross means we found nothing there, not that Profit.co has no such document.

Where Profit.co sits in Performance management

  1. A0 0%
  2. B0 0%
  3. C6 15%
  4. D6 15%
  5. E12 29%
  6. F17 41%
41 vendors with a score. Bands have fixed thresholds, see how the score works.

The band of Profit.co is marked. Vendors without a score are the ones where we could measure too few criteria to rank them – a gap on our side, counted separately.

What Profit.co states

The exact figures and names we read off the pages linked below, with the sentence they stand in. This is what they publish, not what we verified about their systems.

Gaps, heaviest first

✗

Subprocessors: the published list

weight 3 of 3

No subprocessor list found.

Checked 7 addresses on 2026-10-12.

Show the 7 addresses we checked
  1. https://profit.co/legal/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://profit.co/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://profit.co/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://profit.co/legal/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://profit.co/trust/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://profit.co/privacy/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://profit.co/legal/subprocessor-list – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Subprocessor list in Performance management: 7 of 41 companies

✗

Public pricing with figures

weight 2 of 3

No public pricing with figures found.

Checked 5 addresses on 2026-10-12.

Show the 5 addresses we checked
  1. https://profit.co/pricing – reached and rendered, no match
  2. https://profit.co/pricing/ – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  3. https://profit.co/plans – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://profit.co/en/pricing – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  5. https://profit.co/pricing-plans – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Public pricing in Performance management: 20 of 41 companies

✗weight 2 of 3

Third-party requests seen on the first load, before any interaction.

Checked 1 address on 2026-10-12.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://profit.co/ – third-party requests before any interaction: accounts.google.com, api.ipify.org, aplo-evnt.com, assets.apollo.io, cdn.mxpnl.com, cdns.zinnect.com, fonts.googleapis.com, gcp-cdns.profitokrs.com, get.geojs.io, px.ads.linkedin.com, s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com, scheduling-api.zinnect.com, snap.licdn.com, storage.googleapis.com

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: No third-party tracking before consent in Performance management: 1 of 40 companies

✗

Notice before subprocessors change

weight 2 of 3

No commitment to give notice before subprocessors change found.

Checked 8 addresses on 2026-10-12.

Show the 8 addresses we checked
  1. https://profit.co/legal/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://profit.co/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://profit.co/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://profit.co/legal/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  5. https://profit.co/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  6. https://profit.co/legal/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://profit.co/trust/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  8. https://profit.co/legal/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Notice before subprocessors change in Performance management: 6 of 41 companies

✗

security.txt (RFC 9116)

weight 1 of 3

No security.txt found.

Checked 1 address on 2026-10-12.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://profit.co/.well-known/security.txt – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: security.txt (RFC 9116) in Performance management: 1 of 40 companies

Evidence

The full source lists sit behind these two groups, so that the answer above stays readable.

Published, with a source 7
✓

Data processing agreement (DPA)

weight 3 of 3

Published and readable without a login.

Source: https://www.profit.co/dpa/ · checked 2026-10-12

Across the market: Data processing agreement in Performance management: 7 of 41 companies

✓

Data location: where they say data is hosted

weight 3 of 3

The hosting location is stated on a public page.

  • Locations named next to the hosting wording Belgium, European Union, Frankfurt, Oregon, United States. This does not establish the company’s headquarters.
    Show the 5 exact wordings

    Iowa (USA), Belgium (EU), Abu Dhabi (UAE), Dammam (KSA) are the primary data centers.

    Read at https://www.profit.co/data-security

    USA Iowa, USA (Primary) Oregon, USA (Secondary) Google cloud platform (GCP) Profit.co application hosting and, application data backups European Union Belgium, Europe (Primary) Frankfurt, Europe (Seco...

    Read at https://www.profit.co/data-security

    rofit.co application hosting and, application data backups European Union Belgium, Europe (Primary) Frankfurt, Europe (Secondary) Google cloud platform (GCP) Profit.co application hosting and, applica...

    Read at https://www.profit.co/data-security

    USA Iowa, USA (Primary) Oregon, USA (Secondary) Google cloud platform (GCP) Profit.co application hosting and, application data backups European Union Belgium, Europe (Primary) Frankfurt, Europe (Seco...

    Read at https://www.profit.co/data-security

    Iowa (USA), Belgium (EU), Abu Dhabi (UAE), Dammam (KSA) are the primary data centers.

    Read at https://www.profit.co/data-security

Source: https://www.profit.co/data-security · checked 2026-10-12

Across the market: Data location stated in Performance management: 22 of 41 companies

✓

Status page with incident history

weight 2 of 3

A public status page with incident history.

Source: https://status.profit.co/ · checked 2026-10-12

Across the market: Status page with history in Performance management: 10 of 40 companies

✓

HTTPS enforced with HSTS

weight 2 of 3

HTTP redirects to HTTPS and the HSTS header is set.

  • HSTS max-age 31536000 seconds (365 days).
    Show the exact wording

    max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Read at https://profit.co/
  • HSTS options includeSubDomains, preload.
    Show the 2 exact wordings

    max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Read at https://profit.co/

    max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Read at https://profit.co/

Source: https://profit.co/ · checked 2026-10-12

Across the market: HTTPS enforced with HSTS in Performance management: 30 of 40 companies

✓

Certifications named (SOC 2, ISO 27001)

weight 1 of 3

SOC 2 or ISO 27001 named on a public page.

Source: https://www.profit.co/data-security · checked 2026-10-12

Across the market: Certifications named in Performance management: 15 of 40 companies

✓

Uptime SLA with a figure

weight 1 of 3

An availability commitment with a figure.

  • Highest uptime figure on that page 99.9 %.
    Show the exact wording

    99.9% Uptime/Availability Profit.co services have an uptime guarantee of 99.9%.

    Read at https://www.profit.co/sla

Source: https://www.profit.co/sla · checked 2026-10-12

Across the market: Uptime SLA with a figure in Performance management: 2 of 40 companies

✓

Named privacy contact (DPO or privacy address)

weight 1 of 3

A data protection officer or a dedicated privacy address is named.

Source: https://www.profit.co/privacy-policy · checked 2026-10-12

Across the market: Named privacy contact in Performance management: 20 of 41 companies

History

100 0 2026-10-05: 57 of 1002026-10-12: 57 of 100 2026-10-05 2026-10-12
Score over the last 2 runs we measured Profit.co in: 57 (2026-10-05), 57 (2026-10-12).

Prepare your vendor review

A source is a starting point. Check the product, plan, legal entity and date before treating it as evidence for your purchase. These questions do not change the transparency score.

Profit.co

7 found · 5 not found · 0 not measured across 12 public checks.

12 of 12 criteria have a measured result from the last 30 days. Oldest dated result: 2026-10-12.

Investigate 5 open evidence questions
  1. Subprocessor list

    Which subprocessors apply to our product, what does each process, and in which countries? Please share the current list.

    Inspect this check
  2. Public pricing

    Please confirm the total cost for our seats and usage, including minimum commitments, add-ons, overages and renewal terms.

    Inspect this check
  3. No third-party tracking before consent

    Which third-party requests occur before a visitor makes a choice, and for what purpose? Please distinguish the public website from the product.

    Inspect this check
  4. security.txt (RFC 9116)

    Where should we report a vulnerability, and what acknowledgement and follow-up process should we expect?

    Inspect this check
  5. Notice before subprocessors change

    How will you notify us before a subprocessor changes, with how much notice, and what response options apply to our contract?

    Inspect this check

Compare

A shortlist holds up to six vendors across categories and lives entirely in the address of its page: share the link, bookmark it, put it in a ticket. Nothing is stored, so we do not know it exists.