SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to C2Perform

Other Performance management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that C2Perform does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 40 that differ from C2Perform on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

C2Perform has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and C2Perform does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and C2Perform does notC2Perform publishes, and they do not
PerformYardperformyard.com 71/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Betterworksbetterworks.com 65/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Profit.coprofit.co 57/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 1 Public pricing Compare
Leapsomeleapsome.com 61/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Perdooperdoo.com 61/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Latticelattice.com 57/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
WorkBoardworkboard.com 48/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 1 Public pricing Compare
Culture Ampcultureamp.com 48/100 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Public pricing Compare
Kudoskudos.com 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history 1 Public pricing Compare
Nectarnectarhr.com 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named 1 Public pricing Compare
Zensaizensai.com 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact Compare
Energageenergage.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.