SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Pagination

Other Print and packaging software vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Pagination. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 45 that differ from Pagination on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Pagination has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Pagination” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at PaginationFound at Pagination, not found there
Threekitthreekit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Threekit 30/100 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Smart Communicationssmartcommunications.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Smart Communications 26/100 4 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
SEAL Systemssealsystems.deSee also Transparency alternatives to SEAL Systems 30/100 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Printplusprintplus.chSee also Transparency alternatives to Printplus 22/100 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Onlineprintersonlineprinters.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Onlineprinters 17/100 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Vistaprint Partnercimpress.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vistaprint Partner 17/100 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
WilcomWorkspacewilcom.comSee also Transparency alternatives to WilcomWorkspace 30/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Public pricing Compare
Teesomteesom.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Teesom 27/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent 1 Data location stated Compare
Francotyp-Postaliafp-francotyp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Francotyp-Postalia 26/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Priintpriint.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Priint 26/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Printboxgetprintbox.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Printbox 26/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Vjoonvjoon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vjoon 26/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.