Transparency alternatives to Vjoon
Other Print and packaging software vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Vjoon. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 44 that differ from Vjoon on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Vjoon has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Vjoon” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Vjoon | Found at Vjoon, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threekitthreekit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Threekit | 30/100 | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Smart Communicationssmartcommunications.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Smart Communications | 26/100 | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| 3DPrinterOS3dprinteros.comSee also Transparency alternatives to 3DPrinterOS | 30/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Customilycustomily.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Customily | 30/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| SEAL Systemssealsystems.deSee also Transparency alternatives to SEAL Systems | 30/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| WilcomWorkspacewilcom.comSee also Transparency alternatives to WilcomWorkspace | 30/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Teesomteesom.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Teesom | 27/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Kickflipgokickflip.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kickflip | 18/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Onlineprintersonlineprinters.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Onlineprinters | 17/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Pitney Bowespitneybowes.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pitney Bowes | 17/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Vistaprint Partnercimpress.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vistaprint Partner | 17/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Compliscomplis.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Complis | 13/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.