Transparency alternatives to iDox.ai
Other Privacy compliance vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at iDox.ai. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 40 that differ from iDox.ai on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
iDox.ai has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at iDox.ai” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at iDox.ai | Found at iDox.ai, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TrustArctrustarc.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TrustArc | 70/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Transcendtranscend.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Transcend | 43/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Secure Privacysecureprivacy.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Secure Privacy | 70/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Didomididomi.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Didomi | 61/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Privacy Beeprivacybee.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Privacy Bee | 48/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Termlytermly.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Termly | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| CookieYescookieyes.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CookieYes | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Securitisecuriti.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Securiti | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Enzuzoenzuzo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Enzuzo | 35/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Cookiefirstcookiefirst.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cookiefirst | 48/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Ethycaethyca.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ethyca | 43/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Ketchketch.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ketch | 43/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.