SaaS Ranking
Menu

TrustArc: what they publish

trustarc.com · Privacy compliance · checked 2026-10-14

70/100BBand B

Rank 1 of 41 in Privacy compliance, where the median is 17.

Public transparency score, not a product or security rating. Latest check: 2026-10-14. How the score works.

Evidence at a glance

Choose a check to see its source, date and scope.

Not found means not found at the addresses we checked. Not measured means we could not complete the check.

Start a vendor reviewDownload evidence (CSV)

Overview

3 days since the newest dated result, 3 since the oldest. 12 of 12 criteria have a measured result in the last 30 days. Failed checks and undated results are excluded.

Evidence freshness is a statement about our measurement and is kept apart from the transparency score, which is frozen at v1. How good our own measurement is.

Transparency labelsaas-ranking.com

TrustArc

trustarc.com · Privacy compliance

  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
B 70of 100 Rank 1 of 41

Published commitments8 of 9 found

Measured behaviour0 of 3 found

Checked 2026-10-14. Every line links the page we found it on. A cross means we found nothing at the addresses we checked, not that the vendor has no such document. A transparency score, not a product rating.

Downloads include all checks, source URLs, dates and the snapshot ID for your procurement file. We do not issue badges.

The label is the whole measurement in one object: every criterion with its weight, the band, and the date. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Every line in it links the page we found the result on, or lists the addresses we checked. A cross means we found nothing there, not that TrustArc has no such document.

Where TrustArc sits in Privacy compliance

  1. A0 0%
  2. B1 2%
  3. C2 5%
  4. D8 20%
  5. E6 15%
  6. F24 59%
41 vendors with a score; 2 more without a score because we could measure too little. Bands have fixed thresholds, see how the score works.

The band of TrustArc is marked. Vendors without a score are the ones where we could measure too few criteria to rank them – a gap on our side, counted separately.

What TrustArc states

The exact figures and names we read off the pages linked below, with the sentence they stand in. This is what they publish, not what we verified about their systems.

Gaps, heaviest first

✗

Public pricing with figures

weight 2 of 3

No public pricing with figures found.

Checked 5 addresses on 2026-10-14.

Show the 5 addresses we checked
  1. https://trustarc.com/pricing – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://trustarc.com/pricing/ – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://trustarc.com/plans – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://trustarc.com/en/pricing – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://trustarc.com/pricing-plans – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Public pricing in Privacy compliance: 16 of 42 companies

✗

HTTPS enforced with HSTS

weight 2 of 3

No enforced HTTPS with HSTS found.

Checked 2 addresses on 2026-10-14.

Show the 2 addresses we checked
  1. http://trustarc.com/ – redirects to https://trustarc.com/
  2. https://trustarc.com/ – no HSTS header

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: HTTPS enforced with HSTS in Privacy compliance: 32 of 43 companies

✗weight 2 of 3

Third-party requests seen on the first load, before any interaction.

  • Third-party hosts we saw on the first load 2 googletagmanager.com, typekit.net.
    Show the 2 exact wordings

    www.googletagmanager.com

    Read at https://trustarc.com/

    p.typekit.net, use.typekit.net

    Read at https://trustarc.com/

Checked 1 address on 2026-10-14.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://trustarc.com/ – third-party requests before any interaction: p.typekit.net, use.typekit.net, www.googletagmanager.com

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: No third-party tracking before consent in Privacy compliance: 2 of 43 companies

✗

security.txt (RFC 9116)

weight 1 of 3

No security.txt found.

Checked 1 address on 2026-10-14.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://trustarc.com/.well-known/security.txt – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: security.txt (RFC 9116) in Privacy compliance: 5 of 42 companies

Evidence

The full source lists sit behind these two groups, so that the answer above stays readable.

Published, with a source 8
✓

Data processing agreement (DPA)

weight 3 of 3

Published and readable without a login.

Source: https://trust.trustarc.com/en-US/policies/data-processing-addendum · checked 2026-10-14

Across the market: Data processing agreement in Privacy compliance: 11 of 41 companies

✓

Subprocessors: the published list

weight 3 of 3

The actual list is published, not just a promise to keep one.

Source: https://trust.trustarc.com/en-US/policies/sub-processors-and-affiliates · checked 2026-10-14

Across the market: Subprocessor list in Privacy compliance: 5 of 41 companies

✓

Data location: where they say data is hosted

weight 3 of 3

The hosting location is stated on a public page.

Source: https://trust.trustarc.com/en-US/policies/trustarc-privacy-notice · checked 2026-10-14

Across the market: Data location stated in Privacy compliance: 9 of 41 companies

✓

Status page with incident history

weight 2 of 3

A public status page with incident history.

Source: https://status.trustarc.com/ · checked 2026-10-14

Across the market: Status page with history in Privacy compliance: 11 of 43 companies

✓

Notice before subprocessors change

weight 2 of 3

The vendor commits publicly to giving notice before the list changes.

Source: https://trust.trustarc.com/en-US/policies/sub-processors-and-affiliates · checked 2026-10-14

Across the market: Notice before subprocessors change in Privacy compliance: 7 of 41 companies

✓

Certifications named (SOC 2, ISO 27001)

weight 1 of 3

SOC 2 or ISO 27001 named on a public page.

  • Named on that page ISO/IEC 27001 (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), SOC 2 (not counted: the sentence does not carry it). The sentence we kept does not carry this finding on its own, so it counts in no list and no figure.
    Show the 2 exact wordings

    lifornia Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act (CDPA) NIST AI Framework ISO/IEC 27001 Explore all Regulations EU Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act) EU's regulation on....

    Read at https://trustarc.com/products/consent-consumer-rights/trust-center/

    rnal-facing privacy, legal, security, and compliance information — from subprocessor disclosures to SOC2 reports — for your buyers and customers to accelerate decisions and close deals faster.

    Read at https://trustarc.com/products/consent-consumer-rights/trust-center/

Source: https://trustarc.com/products/consent-consumer-rights/trust-center/ · checked 2026-10-14

Across the market: Certifications named in Privacy compliance: 11 of 42 companies

✓

Uptime SLA with a figure

weight 1 of 3

An availability commitment with a figure.

  • Highest uptime figure on that page 100 %.
    Show the exact wording

    by TrustArc and Customer was negatively impacted (system availability being measured by TrustArc at 100% down during the window in question), TrustArc shall provide, as the sole and exclusive remedy,....

    Read at https://trust.trustarc.com/en-US/policies/service-level-agreement

Source: https://trust.trustarc.com/en-US/policies/service-level-agreement · checked 2026-10-14

Across the market: Uptime SLA with a figure in Privacy compliance: 3 of 41 companies

✓

Named privacy contact (DPO or privacy address)

weight 1 of 3

A data protection officer or a dedicated privacy address is named.

Source: https://trust.trustarc.com/en-US/policies/trustarc-privacy-notice · checked 2026-10-14

Across the market: Named privacy contact in Privacy compliance: 20 of 41 companies

History

100 0 2026-10-07: 70 of 1002026-10-14: 70 of 100 2026-10-07 2026-10-14
Score over the last 2 runs we measured TrustArc in: 70 (2026-10-07), 70 (2026-10-14).

Prepare your vendor review

A source is a starting point. Check the product, plan, legal entity and date before treating it as evidence for your purchase. These questions do not change the transparency score.

TrustArc

8 found · 4 not found · 0 not measured across 12 public checks.

12 of 12 criteria have a measured result from the last 30 days. Oldest dated result: 2026-10-14.

Investigate 4 open evidence questions
  1. Public pricing

    Please confirm the total cost for our seats and usage, including minimum commitments, add-ons, overages and renewal terms.

    Inspect this check
  2. HTTPS enforced with HSTS

    How is HTTPS enforced on the product and sign-in domains we will use? Please distinguish those domains from the public website.

    Inspect this check
  3. No third-party tracking before consent

    Which third-party requests occur before a visitor makes a choice, and for what purpose? Please distinguish the public website from the product.

    Inspect this check
  4. security.txt (RFC 9116)

    Where should we report a vulnerability, and what acknowledgement and follow-up process should we expect?

    Inspect this check

Compare

A shortlist holds up to six vendors across categories and lives entirely in the address of its page: share the link, bookmark it, put it in a ticket. Nothing is stored, so we do not know it exists.