Alternatives to Infisical
Other Privileged access management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Infisical does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 29 that differ from Infisical on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Infisical has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Infisical does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Infisical does not | Infisical publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dopplerdoppler.com | 83/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Delineadelinea.com | 78/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| StrongDMstrongdm.com | 65/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Akeylessakeyless.io | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| GitGuardiangitguardian.com | 65/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| ConductorOneconductorone.com | 61/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Devolutionsdevolutions.net | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| NordLayernordlayer.com | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named | 3 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Oleriaoleria.com | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Cyolocyolo.io | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Heimdalheimdalsecurity.com | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | 5 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Silverfortsilverfort.com | 22/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 6 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +3 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.