SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Delinea

Other Privileged access management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Delinea. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 40 that differ from Delinea on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Delinea has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “Found there, not found at Delinea” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at DelineaFound at Delinea, not found there
Tailscaletailscale.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tailscale 70/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history Compare
Dopplerdoppler.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Doppler 83/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Devolutionsdevolutions.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Devolutions 70/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named Compare
Infisicalinfisical.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Infisical 48/100 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Phasephase.devSee also Transparency alternatives to Phase 39/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 Compare
Opalopal.devSee also Transparency alternatives to Opal 35/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 Compare
C1c1.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to C1 61/100 1 Uptime SLA with a figure 1 Status page with history Compare
SailPointsailpoint.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SailPoint 61/100 1 Data location stated 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Twingatetwingate.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Twingate 57/100 1 Public pricing 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
GitGuardiangitguardian.comSee also Transparency alternatives to GitGuardian 52/100 1 Public pricing 3 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact Compare
StrongDMstrongdm.comSee also Transparency alternatives to StrongDM 52/100 1 Uptime SLA with a figure 2 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
NordLayernordlayer.comSee also Transparency alternatives to NordLayer 48/100 1 Public pricing 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.