SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Keelvar

Other Procurement vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Keelvar. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 38 that differ from Keelvar on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Keelvar has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Status page with history, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Keelvar” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at KeelvarFound at Keelvar, not found there
Procurifyprocurify.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Procurify 52/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing 4 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare
Mediusmedius.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Medius 30/100 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 Compare
Pactumpactum.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pactum 26/100 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 Compare
Onventisonventis.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Onventis 48/100 1 Status page with history 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 Compare
Precoroprecoro.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Precoro 39/100 1 Public pricing 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 Compare
Zipziphq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zip 39/100 1 Status page with history 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 Compare
Yordexyordex.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Yordex 35/100 1 Public pricing 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +2 Compare
Turbineturbinehq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Turbine 30/100 1 Public pricing 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +3 Compare
Archletarchlet.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Archlet 22/100 1 Status page with history 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 Compare
Baswarebasware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Basware 22/100 1 Public pricing 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 Compare
Tradogramtradogram.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tradogram 22/100 1 Public pricing 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 Compare
Team Procureteamprocure.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Team Procure 17/100 1 Public pricing 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.