SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Procurify

Other Procurement vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Procurify. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 38 that differ from Procurify on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Procurify has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Procurify” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at ProcurifyFound at Procurify, not found there
Keelvarkeelvar.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Keelvar 70/100 4 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 2 Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Zipziphq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zip 39/100 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Mediusmedius.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Medius 30/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Pactumpactum.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pactum 26/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 Compare
Onventisonventis.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Onventis 48/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Public pricing, Certifications named Compare
Precoroprecoro.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Precoro 39/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history Compare
Yordexyordex.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Yordex 35/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
Turbineturbinehq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Turbine 30/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Compleat Softwarecompleatsoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Compleat Software 26/100 1 Notice before subprocessors change 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 Compare
Weprocweproc.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Weproc 26/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 Compare
Archletarchlet.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Archlet 22/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 Compare
Baswarebasware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Basware 22/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.