Alternatives to Pactum
Other Procurement vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Pactum does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 16 that differ from Pactum on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Pactum has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Pactum does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Pactum does not | Pactum publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keelvarkeelvar.com | 70/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Procurifyprocurify.com | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Onventisonventis.com | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Archletarchlet.io | 35/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Mediusmedius.com | 30/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Levelpathlevelpath.com | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 4 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Baswarebasware.com | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Ivaluaivalua.com | 30/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Weprocweproc.com | 17/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 4 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Fairmarkitfairmarkit.com | 9/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| GEPgep.com | 9/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| IntegrityNextintegritynext.com | 9/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.