SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Archlet

Other Procurement vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Archlet. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 38 that differ from Archlet on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Archlet has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Archlet” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at ArchletFound at Archlet, not found there
Keelvarkeelvar.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Keelvar 70/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 1 Status page with history Compare
Procurifyprocurify.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Procurify 52/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Precoroprecoro.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Precoro 39/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named 1 Status page with history Compare
Zipziphq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zip 39/100 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Pactumpactum.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pactum 26/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Onventisonventis.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Onventis 48/100 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated nothing Compare
Yordexyordex.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Yordex 35/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 1 Status page with history Compare
Mediusmedius.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Medius 30/100 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Turbineturbinehq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Turbine 30/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Compleat Softwarecompleatsoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Compleat Software 26/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Weprocweproc.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Weproc 26/100 1 Data location stated 1 Status page with history Compare
Baswarebasware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Basware 22/100 1 Public pricing 1 Status page with history Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.