SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Archlet

Other Procurement vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Archlet does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 16 that differ from Archlet on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Archlet has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Archlet does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Archlet does notArchlet publishes, and they do not
Keelvarkeelvar.com 70/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +2 1 Status page with history Compare
Procurifyprocurify.com 52/100 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Pactumpactum.com 35/100 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Mediusmedius.com 30/100 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Data location stated Compare
Onventisonventis.com 48/100 1 Data processing agreement nothing Compare
Ivaluaivalua.com 30/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Status page with history Compare
Baswarebasware.com 22/100 1 Public pricing 2 Data location stated, Status page with history Compare
Simfonisimfoni.com 4/100 1 Certifications named 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare
Levelpathlevelpath.com 26/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Weprocweproc.com 17/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Fairmarkitfairmarkit.com 9/100 nothing we found there and not here 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
GEPgep.com 9/100 nothing we found there and not here 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.