SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to DataFeedWatch

Other Product information management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at DataFeedWatch. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 37 that differ from DataFeedWatch on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

DataFeedWatch has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at DataFeedWatch” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at DataFeedWatchFound at DataFeedWatch, not found there
Sodasoda.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Soda 65/100 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Siffletsiffletdata.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sifflet 52/100 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Alationalation.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Alation 39/100 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Akeneoakeneo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Akeneo 22/100 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
data.worlddata.worldSee also Transparency alternatives to data.world 39/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Reltioreltio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Reltio 39/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure 1 Public pricing Compare
Ataccamaataccama.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ataccama 30/100 3 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 1 Data location stated Compare
Castorcastordoc.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Castor 30/100 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Plytixplytix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Plytix 30/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Profiseeprofisee.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Profisee 30/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Tamrtamr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tamr 30/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Atlanatlan.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Atlan 26/100 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.