SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Buildium

Other Property management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Buildium. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 62 that differ from Buildium on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Buildium has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Buildium” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at BuildiumFound at Buildium, not found there
Plentificplentific.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Plentific 74/100 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 1 Public pricing Compare
RealPagerealpage.comSee also Transparency alternatives to RealPage 48/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 2 Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
DomLiftdomliftapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DomLift 35/100 4 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 2 Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Aareonaareon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Aareon 30/100 4 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 2 Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Propertywarepropertyware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Propertyware 43/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Valcrevalcre.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Valcre 35/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Status page with history Compare
Rentilarentila.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rentila 26/100 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 2 Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Reapitreapit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Reapit 17/100 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 2 Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
DoorLoopdoorloop.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DoorLoop 30/100 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Landlord Studiolandlordstudio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Landlord Studio 30/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Status page with history Compare
LetHublethub.coSee also Transparency alternatives to LetHub 30/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Status page with history Compare
10ninety10ninety.co.ukSee also Transparency alternatives to 10ninety 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.