Transparency alternatives to Reapit
Other Property management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Reapit. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 63 that differ from Reapit on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Reapit has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Reapit” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Reapit | Found at Reapit, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plentificplentific.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Plentific | 74/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| RealPagerealpage.comSee also Transparency alternatives to RealPage | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Propertywarepropertyware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Propertyware | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| DomLiftdomliftapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DomLift | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Valcrevalcre.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Valcre | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Aareonaareon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Aareon | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| DoorLoopdoorloop.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DoorLoop | 30/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Landlord Studiolandlordstudio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Landlord Studio | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| LetHublethub.coSee also Transparency alternatives to LetHub | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| 10ninety10ninety.co.ukSee also Transparency alternatives to 10ninety | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| RentRedirentredi.comSee also Transparency alternatives to RentRedi | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Entrataentrata.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Entrata | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.