Transparency alternatives to AM System Classic
Other Quality management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at AM System Classic. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 84 that differ from AM System Classic on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
AM System Classic has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at AM System Classic” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at AM System Classic | Found at AM System Classic, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ketryxketryx.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ketryx | 43/100 | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 2 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Cognidoxcognidox.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cognidox | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| myoshmyosh.comSee also Transparency alternatives to myosh | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Castor EDCcastoredc.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Castor EDC | 17/100 | 4 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| SimplerQMSsimplerqms.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SimplerQMS | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Certainty Softwarecertaintysoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Certainty Software | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Propelpropelsoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Propel | 35/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Arenaarenasolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Arena | 26/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Openbomopenbom.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Openbom | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Skytrustskytrust.com.auSee also Transparency alternatives to Skytrust | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| SoftComplysoftcomply.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SoftComply | 26/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Durodurolabs.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Duro | 22/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.