Transparency alternatives to AM System Classic
Other Quality management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that AM System Classic does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 84 that differ from AM System Classic on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
AM System Classic has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and AM System Classic does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and AM System Classic does not | AM System Classic publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ketryxketryx.com | 43/100 | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 2 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Cognidoxcognidox.com | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| myoshmyosh.com | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Castor EDCcastoredc.com | 17/100 | 4 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| SimplerQMSsimplerqms.com | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Arenaarenasolutions.com | 35/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Propelpropelsoftware.com | 35/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Certainty Softwarecertaintysoftware.com | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Openbomopenbom.com | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Skytrustskytrust.com.au | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| SoftComplysoftcomply.com | 26/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Worx Safetyworxsafety.com.au | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.