Alternatives to Propel
Other Quality management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Propel does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 33 that differ from Propel on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Propel has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Propel does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Propel does not | Propel publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qualioqualio.com | 57/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| SimplerQMSsimplerqms.com | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Ketryxketryx.com | 43/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Arenaarenasolutions.com | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Castor EDCcastoredc.com | 17/100 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Cognidoxcognidox.com | 39/100 | 1 Data location stated | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Openbomopenbom.com | 26/100 | 1 Data location stated | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Orcanosorcanos.com | 26/100 | 1 Data location stated | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| SoftComplysoftcomply.com | 26/100 | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Durodurolabs.co | 22/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Rimsysrimsys.io | 22/100 | 1 Data location stated | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| CAQ AGcaq.de | 18/100 | 1 Data location stated | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.