Transparency alternatives to Castor EDC
Other Quality management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Castor EDC. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 84 that differ from Castor EDC on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Castor EDC has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Castor EDC” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Castor EDC | Found at Castor EDC, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SimplerQMSsimplerqms.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SimplerQMS | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Qualioqualio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Qualio | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| AM System Classicamsystem.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AM System Classic | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 4 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Ketryxketryx.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ketryx | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Cognidoxcognidox.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cognidox | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| myoshmyosh.comSee also Transparency alternatives to myosh | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Certainty Softwarecertaintysoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Certainty Software | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Grand Avenue Softwaregrandavenue.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Grand Avenue Software | 35/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Propelpropelsoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Propel | 35/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| TrackWisespartasystems.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TrackWise | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Arenaarenasolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Arena | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Openbomopenbom.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Openbom | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.