Alternatives to Castor EDC
Other Quality management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Castor EDC does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 27 that differ from Castor EDC on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Castor EDC has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Castor EDC does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Castor EDC does not | Castor EDC publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qualioqualio.com | 57/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Ketryxketryx.com | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Arenaarenasolutions.com | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Cognidoxcognidox.com | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Openbomopenbom.com | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Orcanosorcanos.com | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Durodurolabs.co | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Greenlight Gurugreenlight.guru | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Rimsysrimsys.io | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Isolocityisolocity.com | 17/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| CAQ AGcaq.de | 18/100 | 1 Data location stated | 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Aligned Elementsaligned.ch | 13/100 | 1 Public pricing | 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.