Transparency alternatives to Grand Avenue Software
Other Quality management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Grand Avenue Software. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 84 that differ from Grand Avenue Software on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Grand Avenue Software has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Grand Avenue Software” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Grand Avenue Software | Found at Grand Avenue Software, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qualioqualio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Qualio | 57/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| SimplerQMSsimplerqms.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SimplerQMS | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | 2 Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Ketryxketryx.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ketryx | 43/100 | 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Cognidoxcognidox.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cognidox | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| myoshmyosh.comSee also Transparency alternatives to myosh | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Certainty Softwarecertaintysoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Certainty Software | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Propelpropelsoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Propel | 35/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| TrackWisespartasystems.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TrackWise | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Arenaarenasolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Arena | 26/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| MasterControlmastercontrol.comSee also Transparency alternatives to MasterControl | 22/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Castor EDCcastoredc.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Castor EDC | 17/100 | 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| AM System Classicamsystem.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AM System Classic | 39/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.